It creates the lib/some-example/engine.rb file which is just as you described and then requires it in lib/some-example.rb. Shouldn't that be enough? On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> I've been creating several engines for Rails lately and I found that having > an engine class inherited from Rails::Engine is required if you intend to > bundle some Sprockets assets. > > So, shouldn't the template for "rails plugin new" change so that "rails > plugin new some-example" would create something like: > > lib/some-example.rb: > > module SomeExample > class Engine < Rails::Engine > end > end > > instead of an empty SomeExample module? > > Maybe the "plugin new" could add some option like '--skip-engine' or disable > it automatically if "--skip-sprockets" is used. > > Make sense? > > Kind regards, > Rodrigo. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > Cumprimentos, Luís Ferreira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
