On Monday, July 9, 2012 12:10:07 PM UTC-7, Nicolás Sanguinetti wrote: > > dup doesn't take arguments because in ruby dup doesn't take arguments. It > wouldn't make sense to break the semantics of ruby just for this, IMO. > I had not considered that. On the other hand: * it's not like dup calls super (which seems wrong to me, now that I think about it) * dup with no args would continue to behave exactly the same as it does, now
Kurt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/xB0hhO8wXqwJ. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
