Do you think anyone currently uses #blank? on enumerables in its current state? It doesn't make sense the way it is right now. Imagine a piece of paper with a list of 10 blank lines. Wouldn't you call that a blank list?
On Monday, July 9, 2012 10:50:34 AM UTC-4, Xavier Noria wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Michael Boutros <michael.bout...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > Yes. > > > Your implementation makes sense. I mean, I believe that if blank? was > defined on enumerables as all?(&:blank?) from the very first day, one could > have accepted that definition just fine. > > But the current definition also makes sense to me. > > Since this is a fundamental predicate in Active Support that has had this > semantic since forever, this modification would be backwards incompatible, > and the current definition is also just fine in my opinion, I think we > should keep it the way it is. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/WL4-tEq6TT0J. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
