On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Michael Koziarski <koziar...@gmail.com>wrote:
Yes, but only on the basis that relying on this behavior is a truly bad > idea if you're actually using memcached at a large scale. But clearly there > are other views on this functionality. > > Given that clearly some people want this then using Entry should be an > optional extra which defaults to off. Or perhaps ship another memcached > store subclass with the bells and whistles. > > That let's people use the race condition ttl stuff and the cache-nil stuff > if they need it, but doesn't apply a non-trivial per-key overhead to > everyone who uses memcached. > So ship this alternative with core? Yeah seems good to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
