Mike, We decided to do this for Rails 4. Can you go ahead and provide a Pull Request?. Mention me on it and I will merge.
Thanks again for putting all this ideas and for minitest-rails :) -- Santiago Pastorino WyeWorks Co-founder http://www.wyeworks.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/spastorino Github: http://github.com/spastorino On Sunday, September 30, 2012, Mike Moore wrote: > On Sep 29, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Santiago Pastorino <spastor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Mike, > > Hey Santiago. > > > I'm personally in favor of what you've proposed. I'm starting a > > discussion with other Rails core members about it. > > In case we decide to accept the changes we should be keeping > > compatibility with the old schema. Only new apps should be using this > > and old apps should continue working. We can probably show a message > > saying that there's a new directory schema for tests. > > What do you think?. Will you be able to provide a patch for all that?. > > Yep. The minitest-rails project has similar goals and is intended to > live side-by-side with existing tests. The biggest issue is the rake > tasks, but its certainly doable. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
