In my case i have 4 methods that return nil, so explicit definition looks wierd for me. So that why i thought maybe such method will useful, at least to make code cleaner
def method1; nil; end def method2; nil; end vs define_methods :method1, :method2, :method3, :method4 def method3; nil; end def method4; nil; end Четвер, 4 жовтня 2012 р. 14:35:50 UTC+3 користувач Robert Pankowecki написав: > > What is the usecase? What value does it provide ? How is it any better > than ? > > def title; nil; end > def type; nil; end > > > Maybe it is just me but I totally do not get what your are trying to > achieve. > > Robert Pankowecki > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/5DmvGbSVkYwJ. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
