Yes. I have given bad example. It should be only:
has_may :boos, class_name: 'Foo'
I was writing fast as I encounter the problem, so don't be mad.
W dni czw 1 maj, 2014 o 23∶31 użytkownik Matt Jones
<al2o...@gmail.com> napisał:
On May 1, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Łukasz Niemier <luk...@niemier.pl>
wrote:
It will be nice, if has_* methods will have named option. Example:
has_many :foos, named: :boos
# equivalent of
has_many :boos, class_name: 'Foo', foreign_key: 'foo_id'
IMHO it is quite often used feature. Also it will be nice to have
scoped option that will allow easy flow with scoped models (i.e.
Blog::Posts).
-1 on this. The first argument of `has_many` is the name you want to
refer to the association by (the root name of all the generated
methods), not the pluralized model name.
It’s sufficiently confusing that I’m pretty sure your expanded
example is incorrect; `Foo` is unlikely to have a column named
`foo_id`…
—Matt Jones
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
