Ok, I’ll take a look at this over the weekend.
Thanks, -foca On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Matthew Draper <matt...@trebex.net> wrote: > On 12 Sep 2014, at 23:01, Nicolás Sanguinetti <h...@nicolassanguinetti.info> > wrote: >> I would much rather do `ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper.truncate(...)` if it >> were possible. >> >> Does this seem interesting / useful to anyone else? > I believe there's good precedent in ruby core/stdlib for this pattern. > But I worry that it would be more confusing (/ difficult to document) for us > to be widely inconsistent. > I guess I'd need a feel for what proportion of our helpers would be > module_function candidates. If it's a good number, then it does seem worth > considering. If it's relatively few (and I suspect it might be?), then maybe > not so much. > Matthew > -- > matt...@trebex.net > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
