You are not storing waldo where you think you are storing it. On first access `@store[:foo]` is already initialized, so it does away with your waldo assignment, then on second and third access you are populating it. `my_hash[:baz]` is `@store[:foo][:baz]`.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Yves-Eric <yemar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > I think I have stumbled upon a bug in HashWithIndifferentAccess. > I cannot pinpoint it exactly, but I have written a small test case that > exhibits the buggy behavior: > > https://gist.github.com/yemartin/54db7476aa41b85e7eb8 > > The same code works fine if we use a regular Hash for `@store` instead of > a HashWithIndifferentAccess. > Is this a known issue or should I fill a bug report? > > > Thank you, > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Wael Khobalatte -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
