Excellent. Thanks for pointing this out. On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:50:08 AM UTC-5, Roque Pinel wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > That is one of the goals of this year's GSoC: > https://github.com/railsgsoc/ideas/wiki/2016-Ideas#implement-ujs-using-native-javascript > > -- > Roque Pinel > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Aaron Lasseigne <aaron.l...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> A small set of Rails features are dependent on the inclusion of jQuery. >> Basically, it's everything UJS does. Including all of jQuery to support UJS >> feels like a heavy weight solution. In the past almost everyone was using >> jQuery so it seemed reasonable to include. The explosion of JS in the last >> few years is starting to make it's inclusion more questionable. Many people >> have switched to using underscore or lodash, they're using polyfills for >> fetch instead of $.ajax, or building heavy clients with one of the million >> available frameworks. In following with Mike Perham's recent gem purge it >> seems like maybe it's time jQuery went as well. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to rubyonrails-co...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
