I don't think "having" is a good idea since it already means something else in SQL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Having_(SQL)
On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 7:27:20 AM UTC-6, Tom Rossi wrote: > > What about using "having"? > > Person.having(:name) > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:28 AM Greg Navis <con...@gregnavis.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Using "present' might be confusing with the presence validation which is >> something different (a blank string is not present but is not nil either). >> >> Best regards >> Greg Navis >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to rubyonrails-co...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
