thanks, David. here is the final version using up()
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript" src="prototype.js"></script>
<style>
ul.mktree li.liOpen ul { display: block; border-left:1px }
ul.mktree li.liClosed ul { display: none; }
ul.mktree li.liOpen .bullet { cursor: pointer; background:
url(minus.gif) center left no-repeat; }
ul.mktree li.liClosed .bullet { cursor: pointer; background:
url(plus.gif) center left no-repeat; }
ul.mktree li.liBullet .bullet { cursor: default; background:
url(bullet.gif) center left no-repeat; }
/* Turn off list bullets */
ul.mktree li { list-style: none; }
/* Provide space for our own "bullet" inside the LI */
ul.mktree li .bullet { padding-left: 15px;}
ul.mktree, ul.mktree ul , ul.mktree li { margin-left:10px; padding:
0px; white-space: nowrap}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="tree_menu" >
<ul class="mktree">
<li class='liClosed'><span class="bullet"> </span>1
<ul>
<li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </
span>1.1</li>
<li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </
span>1.2</li>
<li class='liClosed'><span class="bullet"> </
span>1.2
<ul>
<li class='liBullet'><span
class="bullet"> </span>1.2.1</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class='liClosed'><span class="bullet"> </span>2
<ul>
<li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </
span>2.1</li>
<li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </
span>2.2</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$("tree_menu").observe("click", function(event) {
var element = Event.element(event);
// enable click on + or - sign
if ( $(element).hasClassName("bullet") ) {
// go one level up to the <li> tag and toggle it
element = $(element).up();
toggleList(element);
}
});
function toggleList(element) {
if( $(element).hasClassName("liOpen") ) {
element.removeClassName("liOpen");
element.addClassName("liClosed");
} else if ( $(element).hasClassName("liClosed") ) {
element.removeClassName("liClosed");
element.addClassName("liOpen");
}
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
On Jun 2, 6:15 pm, David Dashifen Kees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm ... when I added plus/minus images, I added <img> tags within the
> list items. I made the list items position:relative and that way I
> could use position:absolute for an <img> and a <label> within the list
> items. Then, with prototype, you can use the up() function to figure
> out what list item you're within.
>
> But, in your case, the best I can think of is to maybe float a <div>
> element over the plus/minus background image?
>
> - Dash -
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > here is a version that adds a + - sign besides the list. the only
> > problem is that it won't expand when i click on the + or - sign..
> > anyway to accomplish that?
>
> > thanks!
>
> > <html>
> > <head>
> > <script type="text/javascript" src="prototype.js"></script>
> > <style>
> > ul.mktree li.liOpen ul { display: block; border-left:1px }
> > ul.mktree li.liClosed ul { display: none; }
> > ul.mktree li.liOpen .bullet { cursor: pointer; background:
> > url(minus.gif) center left no-repeat; }
> > ul.mktree li.liClosed .bullet { cursor: pointer; background:
> > url(plus.gif) center left no-repeat; }
> > ul.mktree li.liBullet .bullet { cursor: default; background:
> > url(bullet.gif) center left no-repeat; }
> > /* Turn off list bullets */
> > ul.mktree li { list-style: none; }
> > /* Provide space for our own "bullet" inside the LI */
> > ul.mktree li .bullet { padding-left: 15px;}
> > ul.mktree, ul.mktree ul , ul.mktree li { margin-left:10px; padding:
> > 0px; white-space: nowrap}
> > </style>
> > </head>
> > <body>
>
> > <div id="tree_menu" >
>
> > <ul class="mktree">
>
> > <li class='liClosed'><span class="bullet"> </span>1
> > <ul>
> > <li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </span>1.1</li>
> > <li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </span>1.2</li>
> > <li class='liClosed'><span class="bullet"> </span>1.2
> > <ul>
> > <li class='liBullet'><span
> > class="bullet"> </span>1.2.1</li>
> > </ul>
> > </li>
> > </ul>
> > </li>
>
> > <li class='liClosed'><span class="bullet"> </span>2
> > <ul>
> > <li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </span>2.1</li>
> > <li class='liBullet'><span class="bullet"> </span>2.2</li>
> > </ul>
> > </li>
>
> > </ul>
>
> > </div>
>
> > <script type="text/javascript">
>
> > $("tree_menu").observe("click", function(event) {
> > var element = Event.element(event);
> > if (element.tagName == "LI") {
> > if( $(element).hasClassName("liOpen") ) {
> > element.removeClassName("liOpen");
> > element.addClassName("liClosed");
> > } else if ( $(element).hasClassName("liClosed") ) {
> > element.removeClassName("liClosed");
> > element.addClassName("liOpen");
> > }
>
> > }
>
> > });
>
> > </script>
>
> > </body>
> > </html>
>
> > On Jun 1, 12:14 pm, David Dashifen Kees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> You don't need to put open/closed classes on your <ul> tags, only the
> >> <li> ones which contain lists. With the CSS that we've defined, there's
> >> not a problem with doing so, but since the class is undefined it may not
> >> really help very much. Other than that, looks good to me.
>
> >> - Dash -
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>> thank you very much, David. here is the simple test html that works
>
> >>> <html>
> >>> <head>
> >>> <script type="text/javascript" src="prototype.js"></script>
> >>> <style>
> >>> li.open ul { display: block; }
> >>> li.closed ul { display: none; }
> >>> </style>
> >>> </head>
> >>> <body>
>
> >>> <div id="tree_menu">
>
> >>> <ul>
> >>> <li class='open'>
> >>> <li class='closed'>1
> >>> <ul class='closed'>
> >>> <li>1.1</li>
> >>> <li>1.2</li>
> >>> </ul>
> >>> </li>
> >>> </li>
> >>> </ul>
>
> >>> </div>
>
> >>> <script type="text/javascript">
>
> >>> $("tree_menu").observe("click", function(event) {
> >>> var element = Event.element(event);
> >>> if (element.tagName == "LI") {
> >>> if( element.hasClassName("open") ) {
> >>> element.removeClassName("open");
> >>> element.addClassName("closed");
> >>> } else {
> >>> element.removeClassName("closed");
> >>> element.addClassName("open");
> >>> }
> >>> }
>
> >>> });
>
> >>> </script>
>
> >>> </body>
> >>> </html>
>
> >>> On Jun 1, 11:38 am, David Dashifen Kees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>> Yes, the JS can do that. Assuming yourtreemenu is within an element,
> >>>> probably a div, with an ID of "treemenu", you can do this:
>
> >>>> $("treemenu").observe("click", function(event) {
> >>>> var element = Event.element(event);
> >>>> /* ... other stuff ... */
>
> >>>> }
>
> >>>> The Event.element() function will return the DOM object which caused the
> >>>> Event to happen. Thus, if you click a specific list item within the
> >>>>treemenu div, then it will (a) call the function above and (b) know
> >>>> exactly which list item was clicked using the Event.element() function.
>
> >>>> - Dash -
>
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> er. i am wrong. I need the ID to identify which list item i am working
> >>>>> on.
> >>>>> i thought that when i click on certain list that js will figure out
> >>>>> which one i am clicking..
>
> >>>>> James.
>
> >>>>> On Jun 1, 11:26 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Jun 1, 11:09 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Each node should have a unique ID. The classname is just to alter the
> >>>>>>> styling from open to close.
>
> >>>>>> I don't see why i need ID for it. All i need is to show or hide a
> >>>>>> branch with onclick. a classname should do it, no?
>
> >>>>>> James.
>
> >>>>>>> On 01/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>>>>> I want to make atreemenu that is only need to be viewed (no drag/
> >>>>>>>> drop, editing ).
>
> >>>>>>>> searched the groups and i found this post. http://xrl.us/wsgg
>
> >>>>>>>> quote the 6th post from David Dashifen Kees
> >>>>>>>> ====
> >>>>>>>> I'd suggest using a structure rather than hierarchical divs; I've
> >>>>>>>> made
> >>>>>>>>treemenus mostly out of unordered lists. The children of any node in
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> list are then contained within an internal <ul> within the <li> of
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> node. Then, when a list item is clicked, you can open or close it's
> >>>>>>>> internal <ul> with toggling or, as I usually do it, changing the
> >>>>>>>> class
> >>>>>>>> name of the list item that you click. That way the class name can
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>> only control the display of any internal <ul> but it can also alter
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> image that appears to the left of the <li> which indicates whether
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> list is expanded or collapsed.
> >>>>>>>> ====
>
> >>>>>>>> that seems to be a simple solution but i don't understand the
> >>>>>>>> "changing the class
> >>>>>>>> name of the list item that you click".. I thought i would give a
> >>>>>>>> unique classname for each <ul> when i generate the wholetree. then i
> >>>>>>>> can expand this <ul> when user click on it. why changing the
> >>>>>>>> classname ? I reread his explanation few time but still can't figure
> >>>>>>>> out the reason..
>
> >>>>>>>> thanks,
>
> >>>>>>>> James.
>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> -----
> >>>>>>> Richard Quadling
> >>>>>>> Zend Certified Engineer
> >>>>>>> :http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
> >>>>>>> "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
