On Feb 6, 7:32 am, Matt Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob, did you get confused?
I don't think so.
> > > You never see
> > > "myMath = new Math()" so there is your prototyping issue.
>
> > Because that is a syntax error - the Math object is not a constructor,
> > it can't be used with new the operator.
>
> I know, thats why I said you never see it.
Then say so, explicitly. It can only add confusion to introduce "your
prototype issue" when the explanation does not need any mention of the
prototype object.
And I do see it, right there. :-)
> You spent quite some time agreeing with me in the context of an
> argument.
I'd argue that it was a discussion, not an argument.
Yes it is.
No it's not...
--
Rob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
