Obviously more requests are bad. But the bigger issue is having a fleshed out dependency tree for all the objects in the library. That way if all we need is Element we can easily clip out the Ajax functionality without having to deal with "object is null". Something in line with what ExtJS has: http://extjs.com/download/build
I'm starting work on a mobile development platform and I'd love to use portions of Prototype. There's no way I can include the whole thing. No to scriptaculous's loading system. Yes to a custom Prototype build. Is there something like that floating around? On Feb 6, 1:05 pm, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > more http requests = bad! > > http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#num_http > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:54 -0800, alex wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I was thinking - wouldn't it be great to have modules for prototype, > > to load separately? Like we have with scriptaculous - > > src="scriptaculous.js?load=effects,dragdrop". And that would make it > > more lightweight. > > > Do you think a considerable advantage could be achieved in this way? > > Just wondering... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
