TJ-
I thought so too when I saw this, but the { success: ..., :failure: ... }
hash to Ajax.Updater isn't the options, it's the container, and it's
perfectly valid! Apparently you can pass this as the first parameter to
Updater (it will convert a single string param to this format, making your
element the success container by default), and it will update one element or
the other depending on whether the call succeeded or failed:
Ajax.Updater = Class.create(Ajax.Request, {
initialize: function($super, container, url, options) {
this.container = {
success: (container.success || container),
failure: (container.failure || (container.success ? null : container))
};
...
}, ...
};
So the Updater call doesn't appear to be the problem. I think we need to
see what's coming back from the PHP script.
-Fred
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:31 AM, T.J. Crowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At a glance, there are at least a couple of problems with your use of
> Ajax.Updater:
>
> 1. You're using options in the options object that don't exist (there
> is no "success" option).
> 2. You're missing a parameter to the constructor.
> 3. The parameters you have supplied are in the wrong order.
>
> ...and it's entirely possible you meant to use Ajax.Request rather
> than Ajax.Updater; I can't be sure.
>
> Hope this helps,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
--
Science answers questions; philosophy questions answers.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
