Builder.node() boils down to DOM operations, but it's a handy DSL for doing
nested element creation without creating all the intermediate objects and
gluing them together:
document.observe('dom:loaded', function() {
$('stuff').update(
Builder.node('table', {id: 'mytable'}, [
Builder.node('tr', [
Builder.node('td', 'cell 1'),
Builder.node('td', 'cell 2'),
Builder.node('td', 'cell 3')
])
])
);
});
Or if you do Builder.dump() first:
Builder.dump();
document.observe('dom:loaded', function() {
$('stuff').update(
TABLE({id: 'mytable'}, [
TR([
TD('cell 1'),
TD('cell 2'),
TD('cell 3')
])
])
);
});
You're free to use whatever method you like best. :-)
-Fred
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:57 AM, AlannY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why there are Builder.node from scriptaculous if threre are exists new
> Element?
>
> Which one should I use to create a DOM elements and then append it to
> some other element?
--
Science answers questions; philosophy questions answers.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
