okay i understand thats hard to find a error if theres no example
other problematic code. but the problem is that there are to many
conditions to make a small example.

i checked the function it self, and as you mentioned above the problem
seems to be that the document is not loaded 100%, even if the browser
says its done.

i found a workaround and maybe i'll find the problem it self too.

thanks for helping
regards
daniel

On 16 Jun., 18:00, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > unfortunately its an intranet application and i can not post an
> > example..
>
> That shoudln't prevent your creating a stripped-down example
> demonstrating the problem; we don't need to see your app, just
> something showing the problem you're having.
>
> I'm suggesting this for two reasons:
>
> 1. Usually, if you go through the steps necessary to create a simple
> test case, you find the problem. :-)
>
> 2. If you don't find the problem, you can post your code so folks can
> help you out.
>
> For me, easily 75% of the time, I find my own answer at Step #1 and
> don't have to move on to Step #2.
>
> FWIW.
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> tj / crowder software / com
>
> On Jun 16, 9:45 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > unfortunately its an intranet application and i can not post an
> > example..
>
> > i tested if the function exists by using:
>
> > alert(document.viewport.getScrollOffsets);
>
> > and the function would be alerted as seen in prototype.js and more
> > confusing is that the getDimensions() method would be called without
> > any error just a line before getScrollOffsets().
>
> > prototype is the first js file that is been loaded:
>
> >         <script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/prototype.js"></script>
> >         <script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/global.js"></script>
> >         <script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/subwindow.js"></script>
> >         <script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/actions.js"></script>
>
> > and the problem lines are located in subwindow.js
>
> > Regards
> > Daniel
>
> > On 16 Jun., 09:58, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > But why does the viewport function not work?
>
> > > Usually this is because you're trying to use it before Prototype is
> > > loaded or before the DOM is ready.  Can you post a trimmed-down
> > > example demonstrating the problem?
> > > --
> > > T.J. Crowder
> > > tj / crowder software / com
>
> > > On Jun 16, 8:49 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > thanks for quick response, after extending the element everything
> > > > works.
>
> > > > But why does the viewport function not work?
>
> > > > On 13 Jun., 19:05, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Besides what Fred said, #getElementsBySelector has been deprecated -
> > > > > use #select instead.
>
> > > > > $(element).up(1).select('li.menu').invoke('removeClassName',
> > > > > 'active');
>
> > > > > - kangax
>
> > > > > On Jun 13, 10:46 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > i'm currently developing a web application with the goal, that
> > > > > > everything should work in as many browsers as possible. im using
> > > > > > prototype and the first barrier is IE (as expected). The problem ist
> > > > > > the following:
>
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > scroll = document.viewport.getScrollOffsets();
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > throws: "Object does not support this method"
>
> > > > > > another problem is that:
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > e.up(1).getElementsBySelector('li.menu').each(function(i)
> > > > > > {i.removeClassName('active');});
> > > > > > ...
>
> > > > > > doesn't work, but:
>
> > > > > > Element.up(e, 1).getElementsBySelector('li.menu').each(function(i)
> > > > > > {i.removeClassName('active');});
>
> > > > > > works fine...
>
> > > > > > As usual everthing works fine in firefox and other "better" 
> > > > > > browsers.
>
> > > > > > Can anybody give me a hint?
>
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > Daniel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to