Alright, figured it out.  Thanks again Matt for your guidance.

On Oct 18, 5:48 pm, ressister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Matt, If anyone could provide an example of the branching
> syntax, that would be helpful.
>
> Regards,
> -A
>
> On Oct 18, 4:11 pm, Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > ressister wrote:
> > > Hi there,
>
> > > I have a revision, #238 which I've since made changes to and committed
> > > so I'm now on revision #240.  I'm not happy with the direction that
> > > I've gone since the two commits I've made, and I want #238 to be the
> > > base.  I wouldn't mind keeping #240 around, which i could just do with
> > > a local copy.
>
> > > When I update to #238 and make changes to it, building off it which i
> > > want to do, anytime I commit, i get a conflict with one of the files
> > > being out of date.  What can i do to make #238 the working build so I
> > > can develop off of that?
>
> > I think you want to "branch". I'm not sure of the exact syntax but you
> > should be able to checkout #238, branch it off and change it, then make
> > that branch the main and have #240 as a fork.
>
> > HTH
>
> > Matt
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to