Rob Nichols wrote: > > Is Rails moving to a pure RESTful design? I don't like REST but love > Rails. I'd hate to think that as Rails develops it will become more > difficult to use it RESTlessly. > ...
Rob, I couldn't agree more with you. I don't see any advantages on using restful resources unless one is developing web services or something like. I myself have written another non-restful scaffold generator in my own native language for starting up my CRUD controllers. I based myself on the restful scaffold generator and changed the views, controller and tests to reflect the good old days Rails used to be. The non-restful is much simpler than the restful approach with less code written and much easier to understand, unless one is willing to deliver web services... Here is my suggestion: write your own non-restful generator. This is very simple. Maybe someone maintains a plugin for adding this non-restful generator. If not, it would be pretty easy to do. I'll not write it since I already have one for my own language (brazilian portuguese) and I'm concentrating efforts for contributing to Rails documentation when I have time and to think in another multi-language views support when I have time. If it works, I'll write another internationalized plugin with a different approach than Globalize and GetText, but with lots of the GetText idea, since I used it a lot for Desktop development and were satisfied with it. But it is not well designed for views translation. It was designed for short messages translation, which is common in Desktop development. Best regards, Rodrigo. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
