On 18 Nov 2008, at 23:41, boblu wrote:
> > yes, the compannies table does not have a columns called > ref_company_id. > It is the table which is referreced by the sections table that has a > ref_company_id as a foreign key. > Can you explain why that error comes out? 'cause I cannot find any > clue about it. It's very weird - in particular it's weird that it goes t0_r0, t0_r16: the number after the r is generated by an each_with_index loop - it should skip over the numbers 1-15. Weird stuff might happen if you had overwritten the column_names or columns methods on your ActiveRecord class but I would have expected that to cause problems elsewhere too. Fred > > > And thank you for mentioning your blog post, and I now know why I feel > my app is much faster using join than using include. > Thank you. > > On Nov 18, 7:37 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Well to answer the question in the subject line, I wrote this a >> little >> while >> back:http://www.spacevatican.org/2008/6/22/the-difference-between-include- >> ... >> A key thing to note is that include in 2.1 and include in 2.0.2 are >> different (but the 2.1 code will fall back to the 2.0.2 code if >> necessary). >> Does the companies table not have columns called ref_company_id ? >> >> Fred > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
