Lisa Klein wrote: > book.user_id = @user.id > > Is this the way it's supposed to be done? I know that it's preferred > to interact with dependent resources through their associations. So > adding the user_id manually seems a bit clunky to me. But I'm not >
Do book.user = @user instead then (ultimately it's the same thing obviously). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
