On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Walter Lee Davis <wa...@wdstudio.com> wrote:
> > 2. Experience with an easier web framework (which I gained from Drupal) > > I agree with the premise here, but I would point out that Drupal is a CMS, > not a framework. Look at CodeIgniter or Symphony or CakePHP for examples of > frameworks. One of those could be used to _build_ Drupal, but the inverse > would never be possible. > I think some people tend to have a different definition of Framework. While I'll agree you are right, in some peoples eyes you could consider Drupal a framework to your site if you expand it extensively and such even though technically most programmers would not consider it as such. I've seen many people mix that up to an extent. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
