On Thursday, 16 May 2013 16:44:20 UTC-4, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote: > > My experimental application where i use shared primary/foreign key is > still in experimental phase. It mostly works, but i had to use > workarounds for saving/updating objects associated through shared > primary/foreign key (i do not want to look trough the details now). I > still think that a natural database structure (the one that looks > natural to me) is more important that Rails conventions. > > Sure, because you TOTALLY know more about database best practices than everybody else...
--Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/51eeb60c-31d7-4053-8721-dc1462f1f301%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
