On May 23, 2014, at 8:03 AM, mike2r <mr...@kalanitech.com> wrote: > I agree with everything Scott says in his post. This is a small point, but I > don't like having routes defined that aren't really used. It's a small > point, because my solution is also going to lead to a different error, but I > prefer to head things off at the source. I would use resources, as Scott > suggests, but limit the actions that you really need such as:
Very good point. My thinking was colored by the fact that I really only do this during development, where I expect to implement the rest of the actions very soon. -- Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/C7B68062-23C5-402F-AEBE-D9C0786DF512%40elevated-dev.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
