On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:56:34 PM UTC-4, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote: > > mike2r wrote in post #1149390: > > IMO, it can be done either way. If you use routes, it would be a little > > cleaner when you are using the same resource more than once to make a > > concern: > > > > concern :commentable do > > resources :comments > > end > > > > resources :posts, concerns: [:commentable] > > resources :users, concerns: [:commentable] > > When doing this, does this mean both of these resources would access the > same controller? How can I have them access different controllers, and > what would a proper naming convention be for each controller in your > example? > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >
If you're referring to the comments resource, yes, both would post to the same controller in your format as well as the one I suggested. If you want them to point to different controllers, you will need to go back to your original format and specify a controller, such as: resources posts do resources comments, controller: "postcomment" end -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/7f872c99-57a0-431d-9da8-da66ce41858f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
