On 5 jan, 18:16, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com> wrote:
> roxml is trying to solve a more general problem - if you models aren't
> activerecord models then they are not going to have a particularly
> useful to_xml on it (the time i used it was generated xml to pass to a
> webservice)
Sorry my bad english. I`m not sure if I understood your answer.
My model is activerecord based, but has just simple attributes
(strings, integers,
dates). Do you mean I don`t need ROXML in this simple case? The non-
roxml
to_xml/from_xml methods can do the job?
>
> It's also pretty handy for parsing incoming xml.
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
