On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 10:00:48 PM UTC, Colin Law wrote: > > On 2 December 2015 at 21:46, Frederick Cheung > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 5:46:49 PM UTC, Jason Hsu, Ruby on > High Speed Rails wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> That said, I'd like to hear from those of you who are still part of the > vast majority who use Ruby on Rails directly on the host OS. How do you > deal with the issues that prompted me to use VirtualBox/Vagrant? (I think > that gemsets are a popular solution. Is this correct?) > > > > > > I don't use gemsets - when using a bundler enabled project it won't let > you load a gem that's not in the Gemfile. > > Can you explain what you mean by that in more detail please, I don't > understand what you are saying. > > If you are using bundler, you can only load gems in the Gemfile or Gemfile.lock
You can see this easily enough with a dummy project: create a folder with an empty Gemfile, and put this in test.rb require 'bundler/setup' require 'uuid' # replace with the name of some gem that is installed on your machine. Running test.rb will fail with a LoadError. Add the gem to the Gemfile (no need to run bundle) and test.rb will run successfully. Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/28ef19b0-78c3-400f-9ba0-376e1ac94623%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
