There's nothing dated about it. Using RJS (Remote JavaScript) rendering gives you the ability to render just the parts of the page you want to replace. With jQuery, you would still have to render the custom HTML that you want to inject into the page, but then you would use load() or replaceWith() to substitute it into the DOM. Now you have two problems.
Walter > On Jun 14, 2017, at 7:54 PM, fugee ohu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wanna render to an element instead of redirecting so went back to my book > Agile Web Development with Rails adding ajax it says to make my link remote: > true and put a respond_to js in my controller and then use a js.erb file Is > that a little dated I've been doing some jquery by including *.js files in > assets/javascripts Can I render my views to the element using jquery instead > of js.erb I notice rails doesn't generate any js.erb files by default Should > I do as the book says or find a way to do it with jquery? thanks ia > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/2a6923a4-e128-4b1f-be14-6eed119e66df%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/709D6D9F-6095-4BF7-BE79-E5591E42EF0F%40wdstudio.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
