On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 6:13:35 PM UTC-4, nynhex wrote: > > How do you expect Rails to work? If your route is /users/:id/posts/:id > the ID of the object must be passed as a param. > > On Jul 4, 2017, at 5:11 PM, fugee ohu <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Seems undesirable for everyone to know your user id from a nested > resources url that looks like /users/5/posts/4 Anyone can advise? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/ef5cf7ec-3967-46e6-a1d3-8cb9e5052c0c%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/ef5cf7ec-3967-46e6-a1d3-8cb9e5052c0c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > Seems a reason not to use nested resources and also not being able to pass > objects with redirects so using nested resources i'm getting caught up > fooling around with flash to render the errors >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/866d29a4-f0a8-4cd3-8460-c92d92202fe3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
