Thanks for the reply. I'm writing the <script> code because i'm testing an example user of the widget, and it simply calls the website that generates the widget. so is there some escaping type issue that would prevent directly rendering a <script> tag from RJS?
On Mar 30, 9:39 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote: > dino d. wrote: > > I'm trying to create a widget where my rails code generates a fresh > > widget (which is javascript) to replace the old one. To do this, I > > need to insert new javascript with AJAX with RJS (so my partial begins > > with <script...). Is this possible? Right now, it replaces the old > > widget div with nothing and I get no errors. Is this a browser > > safeguard or something? > > Wouldn't your controller action look like this? > > def xhr_whatever > render :update do |rjs| > rjs.replace :my_div, '<script> js blah blah blah </script>' > end > end > > The stack should handle escaping, javascript-ing, escaping, transmitting, > de-escaping, evaluating, and de-escaping that. > > But I'm sure there's a better way to write your actual feature. I sling Ajax > here and there all the time and never once found a need to push a > '<script>'... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
