Ryan,

I had something similar on Rails 2.2.2 recently. In my case,
Object.first was returning nil but Object.all.first was working. I
banged my head for a bit then decided it wasn't important to "solve"
it at this time as the client just needed the project done, so I left
it as Object.all.first, which isn't as efficient, but still works.

I'd be interested if you figured this out. It seems so arbitrary.

One other thing that I would try if I were you: can you connect
directly to MySQL and try running the queries there by hand and see
what they return? That may help track down whether it's even a Rails
issue at all. I use CocoaSQL on my mac which makes it really easy to
copy-n-paste the SQL queries from the log/debugger and try them.

If it works fine in SQL directly, then you've ruled that out and can
focus on Rails, AR, caching and the like. Try it from script/console
as well to rule out web server (which probably isn't related anyway,
but it's always good rule things out).

If it doesn't work right in SQL, then you've ruled out Rails, and can
focus on what is screwed up with MySQL.

Best of luck! Post your response when you figure it out. :-)

-Danimal

On Mar 30, 4:20 pm, Ryan Waldron <r...@erebor.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to track down a strange test error.  This project has Rails 2.1.0
> frozen in vendor/rails . On my MacBook Pro, the problem boils down to this:
>
> (rdb:1) Invoice.first(:order=>'id desc')
>
> #<Invoice id: 3, type: "Invoice", name: "Invoice 1 for Job 1", memo: nil,
> created_at: "2007-09-03 00:00:00", updated_at: "2009-03-30 16:49:48",
> est_inv_number: "1-03", status: "free", qb_txn_id: nil, per_quote: false,
> bill_to: nil, printed_at: nil, emailed_at: nil, faxed_at: nil,
> invoiceable_type: "Job", invoiceable_id: 1, qb_sent_at: nil, company_id:
> 850010094, itemize_tax_markup: false, bill_to_customer_id: nil,
> qb_class_override: nil, proposal_loaded: false, proposal_date: nil,
> proposal_re: nil, proposal_attn: nil, proposal_body: nil, proposal_include:
> nil, proposal_exclude: nil, proposal_sig: nil, date: "2007-09-03">
>
> (rdb:1) Invoice.find(:all, :order=>'id desc').first
>
> #<Invoice id: 9, type: "Invoice", name: "Estimate 1 for Job 1", memo: nil,
> created_at: "2009-03-30 16:52:48", updated_at: "2009-03-30 16:52:48",
> est_inv_number: "1-05", status: "free", qb_txn_id: nil, per_quote: false,
> bill_to: nil, printed_at: nil, emailed_at: nil, faxed_at: nil,
> invoiceable_type: "Job", invoiceable_id: 1, qb_sent_at: nil, company_id:
> 850010094, itemize_tax_markup: false, bill_to_customer_id: nil,
> qb_class_override: nil, proposal_loaded: false, proposal_date: nil,
> proposal_re: nil, proposal_attn: nil, proposal_body: nil, proposal_include:
> nil, proposal_exclude: nil, proposal_sig: nil, date: "2009-03-30">
>
> I'm in the debugger in the middle of a test run.  I have another Mac,
> running the same version of the code, checked out from the same repository,
> on which this works fine.  The SQL queries produced for these two lines is
> identical on both machines:
>
>   Invoice Load (0.000516)   SELECT * FROM `est_invs` WHERE (
> (`est_invs`.`type` = 'Invoice' ) ) ORDER BY id desc LIMIT 1
>
> and
>
>   Invoice Load (0.000536)   SELECT * FROM `est_invs` WHERE (
> (`est_invs`.`type` = 'Invoice' ) ) ORDER BY id desc
>
> Here's another way of looking at the same weirdness:
>
> (rdb:1) Invoice.first.id <http://invoice.first.id/>
> 3
> (rdb:1) Invoice.last.id <http://invoice.last.id/>
> 3
> (rdb:1) Invoice.all.map(&:id)
> [3, 4, 5, 6, 9]
> (rdb:1) Invoice.all.first.id <http://invoice.all.first.id/>
> 3
> (rdb:1) Invoice.all.last.id <http://invoice.all.last.id/>
> 9
>
> On my other Mac, running the same code, same test, etc., it looks like this
> (which is how it should look):
>
> (rdb:1) Invoice.first.id <http://invoice.first.id/>
> 3
> (rdb:1) Invoice.last.id <http://invoice.last.id/>
> 9
> (rdb:1) Invoice.all.map(&:id)
> [3, 4, 5, 6, 9]
> (rdb:1) Invoice.all.first.id <http://invoice.all.first.id/>
> 3
> (rdb:1) Invoice.all.last.id <http://invoice.all.last.id/>
> 9
>
> I can't figure out what's going on.  I've been staring at this off and on
> for days, and I'm out of ideas.  Anyone have any good ones?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to