> -----Original Message-----
> From: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:rubyonrails-
> t...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Phlip
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 12:54 PM
> To: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [Rails] Re: [ANN] assert2 presents assert_no_rjs_, and .should
> send_js_to
>
>
> I can't think of a reason not to use .should be_html_with{ without!{
> ...} }
It could, if I could determine whether the matcher was being called with
.should or .should_not. I don't know of a way to do this?
Anyway I'm excited about this new release. Thanks.
Brandon
>
> And it seems that .should_not be_html_with() would, in theory, pass if
> a page
> weren't HTML...
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
