Not able to understand the flow of control.
What is mop? Could you explain a bit further? This is interesting..
On Apr 12, 3:13 am, Me <chabg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok this is weird, I have full CRUD working for my contacts table all
> doing ajax inline in my form. the odd one is that my delete funtion
> uses the same partial as the one above and when I do the rjs for the
> update on the select it DOES give me the "Prompt" to select User.
> Delete is the only one that the prompt actually comes back on. Same
> partial used on all of the updates to the contact select.
>
> On Apr 11, 12:26 pm, Chris Habgood <chabg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, I used the ID of the select and did a replace:
>
> > RJS:
> > page[:showcontact].hide
> > page[:contactlist].show
> > page.insert_html :bottom,'contactlist', :partial => 'ajaxAddToMop', :locals
> > => {:contact => @contact }
> > page[:contact_id].replace :partial => "updateContactList", :locals =>
> > {:contacts => @contacts, :mop => @mop }
>
> > Partial:
>
> > <%= select('contact', 'id', @contacts, {:prompt => 'Select Contact'} ,{
> > :onchange => remote_function(:url => { :controller => 'contacts',
> > :action => "ajaxshowcontact", :id => @mop.id},
>
> > :with => "'contactid=' + this.value" )
>
> > } ) %>
>
> > No change. Prompt is still not showing up. Data is there jsut not he
> > prompt. I need the prompt as I use an ajax on change so the user can
> > view/edit/update the user info if necessary inside the form. the controller
> > code basically is updating the contact lsit.
>
> > 1.Gets all contacts.
> > 2. gets all contacts associated with the form
> > 3. subtracts the two and givesme an array with the contacts not associated
> > woit the form.
> > 4. As I add users to the form I make the association to the form. This way
> > I can update the list easier than keeping track of an array.
>
> > Here is the controller code, no real significance.
>
> > def ajaxAddToMop
> > @contact = Contact.find(params[:contact][:id], :include => [:company])
> > @mop = Mop.find(params[:id])
> > @mop.contacts << @contact
> > a = Contact.all.collect{|p| [ p.id ] }
> > b = @mop.contacts.all.collect{|p| [ p.id ] }
> > c = a-b
> > ar = Array.new
> > c.each{|arr|
> > arr.each{|p|
> > ar << p
> > }
> > }
>
> > @contacts = Contact.find(:all, :conditions => ["id IN (?)",
> > ar]).collect {|p| [ p.name, p.id ] }
> > end
>
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Jaryl Sim
> > <quantum.crus...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > Hmm, hope you can post up more code, even from your controller as
> > > well.
>
> > > I think that instead of replacing the entire select tag, you can
> > > simply replace its contents. Firstly, give the select tag an id so
> > > that in your RJS, you can replace_html with options_for_select or
> > > whatever function you might want to use.
>
> > > On Apr 11, 8:01 am, Chris Habgood <chabg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Ok, that select I put is the only thing in the partial.
> > > > Here is the rjs:
> > > > page[:contact_list].replace_html :partial => 'updateContactList',
> > > > :locals
> > > =>
> > > > { :contact => @contact }
>
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Me wrote:
> > > > > > I have this select in a form:
> > > > > > <%= select('contact', 'id', @contacts, {:prompt => 'Select Contact'}
> > > ,
> > > > > > { :onchange => remote_function(:url => { :controller =>
> > > > > > 'contacts', :action => "ajaxshowcontact", :id => @mop.id}, :with =>
> > > > > > "'contactid=' + this.value" )
> > > > > > } ) %>
>
> > > > > > The prompt works in the form but when I do a replace_html on it I
> > > > > > get
> > > > > > everything but the prompt.
>
> > > > > Post the replace_html code?
>
> > > > > Next, put only that <%= select %> thing into a partial (yes tiny
> > > otherwise
> > > > > useless partials are a Best Practice), then do rjs.replace_html
> > > :my_div,
> > > > > :partial => 'my_partial'. (I call "rjs" the variable everyone else
> > > calls
> > > > > "page",
> > > > > because the interthing has too many "page" variables all over it!)
>
> > > > > You could also see about putting the :url into a named route. Just
> > > about
> > > > > anything in Rails that's "named" is a best practice, too!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
