Srdjan Pejic wrote: > I don't know if STI is appropriate here. On second thought, you're absolutely right. I don't know what the heck I was thinking. :)
> > You should probably have a model called Rating which is the many side > of one-to-many with the User model. The Rating model should be > polymorphic so that you can use it to rate both Word and Quote > objects. [...] Yeah, this is what I was trying for. I just introduced STI in an inappropriate place. Note, though, that *not* using STI makes foreign-key validation somewhat harder. > > So, it would most likely look like this: > > class User > :has_many => :ratings > end > > class Rating > :belongs_to => :user > :belongs_to => :rated, :polymorphic => true > end > > class Word > :has_one :rating, :as => :rated > end > > class Quote > :has_one :rating, :as => :rated > end Those should be has_many... Best, Marnen -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
