Frederick Cheung wrote: [...] > Fixtures are a bit odd - they're more table based than class based > (sortof - hence the odd). If you stick everything in reports.yml you > should be ok.
Or just use factories. At least with Machinist, they seem to work directly with the class structure. I've never used STI with Machinist, but I'd be *very* surprised, given Machinist's architecture, if it didn't work as expected, without the gotchas of fixtures. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
