Flower Born wrote: > > AFAIK, Ruby EE is not significantly faster, but has a much smaller > memory use? > > -J
According to Phusion's own benchmarks at http://www.rubyenterpriseedition.com/comparisons.html , Ruby EE is faster than MRI, at least in conjunction with Passenger. I recently found a set of Ruby-only benchmarks taking into account JRuby as well as all other leading Ruby interpreters, and in those, I seem to recall that REE fared even better -- comparable to JRuby and significantly faster than MRI. Of course, now I can't find the URL for that one. :P Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
