Alpha Blue wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Again, you bring up some solid points, and some I agree with and others > I don't. However, at this stage in my app (at least for this season) I > can't alter or test any of what you speak about.
Poppycock. You might not be willing to alter your production DB this season, but you *can* (and probably should) set up a testing environment to see what you can do. > > I will definitely test a single table in development as the season > progresses and see how much more optimized it is. I'm just skeptical > but I'm sure I'm not the only one that is this way when it comes to a > table this large. I think a 518-field table sounds odd, but perhaps right for what you're doing. However, a large number of single-column tables sounds far odder. > > I know it's not the biggest table ever, but a table that size still has > me concerned. Why? > However, you could be right! Maybe it's the real way to > go. I don't know at this point. > > I just wanted to let you know that I do hear what you are saying and > that if you are correct in everything you say, it would help me for each > new season. > > So, my thanks to you for the input and feedback, and most of all - for > following up on your comments with some solid rebuttals! > > Take care mate. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
