Greg Donald wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jedrin <jrubia...@gmail.com> wrote: >> try. Having empty <tr> <td> tags in the > > Empty tags is invalid HTML.
No it's not. Check with the W3C validator. It has no problem with <table><tr><td></td></tr></table> > Use a non-breaking space or > something similar to make it valid. That's no more or less valid than an empty container. But it does have different semantics, which the OP may or may not want. > > <tr> <td> Well, that's not valid by itself... > > > -- > Greg Donald > http://destiney.com/ Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
