Aldric Giacomoni wrote: > Curtis Cooley wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Michael Guterl <li...@ruby-forum.com> >> wrote: >>>> generally see puts and logger output immediately. >>> Dude, don't be such a dick. Logging doesn't necessarily have to do with >>> debugging or test-first development. >>> >> >> Actually they do. Logging is a form of debugging, and often is >> suggested as the first form before jumping into a debugger and walking >> through code. >> > > Unless of course you have specific NEEDS for logging, like HIPAA > regulations. Sometimes it doesn't matter how clever you are, or how well > your tests are built. You simply need logs.
Although for that sort of logging, the Rails logger probably wouldn't be much good. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
