> I am not exactly sure what is meant by CoC, Continuity of Code? CoC means "convention over configuration", which is supposed to be one of Rails' founding philosophies.
> if you are determined to play along with an outdated book that uses an > outdated version of Rails, you might consider installing and using an > outdated version of Rails... It's not that I'm determined to play with an outdated book, I just thought, this book was the de facto reference for Rails, but I guess I might have been wrong about it. >Hi Tuti, >You can still use a empty controller method. >You just have to name it ie. index.html.erb or index.erb :) That is exactly what I had, but it didn't work until I added the respond_to code. Not that I intend to have empty controller methods, but I'd still like to know why it didn't function. >Rails 2.x is very different from Rails 1.x. Try to find an up-to-date >book. http://guides.rails.info is also a great place to start. I had been on this page before and tried out the first tutorials. Guess I'll go more in depth. Thanks for your replies! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
