The underlying meaning of this statement is; Rails as a framework use to favour a certain Javascript framework (Prototype). This doesn't mean that you alone would need to write your own solution for JQuery, but someone, somewhere *did* have to write JRails. Likewise, if you wanted to use Mootools, someone would need to write a solution for it. Rails 3 and UJS solve this problem, among others.
On Feb 11, 7:51 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:33 PM, overture <phil.mccl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just did a post on using UJS in Rails 3 - > >http://therailworld.com/posts/26-Using-Prototype-and-JQuery-with-Rail... > > <snip> > so if you wanted to use JQuery or MooTools you would need to do make > your own solution. > </snip> > > Wrong. There is JRails which uses jQuery and provides all same > javascript helpers. > > http://github.com/aaronchi/jrails > > In addition, any jQuery you want to run through the page object is as simple > as: > > page << "$('#foo').bar();" > > -- > Greg Donald > destiney.com | gregdonald.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
