Wouldn't ActiveRecord Observer class do what you're looking for?
On Feb 16, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Max Williams wrote: > Thanks a lot Michael > > I ended up doing your second suggestion, shying away from the rails > magic since i couldn't seem to really control it. > > Personally it seems most natural to me for rails to work the association > magic when either the foreign key is changed or the direct association > set method is called. I was hunting around and there's various > discussions about this on rails development forums but i guess it never > got resolved, or the rails gods decided against it. > > Anyway, thanks again for your advice. > > max > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
