On Mar 7, 3:57 am, Phillip Koebbe <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > I have a utility controller that has an action in it. Before I changed > to namespaced controllers, I could access the action with: > > /utility/my_action > > There are no resources associated with the controller, so I'm assuming > the stock route > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id' > > picked it up. However, for reasons I don't want to go into detail about, > I moved the utility controller into a namespace (Web), and the route > started failing. Ultimately, I added >
The only thing I've noticed with namespaced controllers like that and the :controller/:action/:id default route is that a restart seems to be required to pick up new controllers. Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
