Conrad Taylor wrote: > namespace :admin do resources :settings do > get :some_action, :on => :member # member route > get :some_other_action, :on => :collection # collection route > end end
Yes, someone *could* explicitly define all actions in the routes.rb, but that is exactly what I do not want to do -- this is not even close to a generic solution :P In addition, I dont like the idea of squeezing all the unRESTful parts of the application into resources, when I do not even need or want all the additional RESTful routes. So, the question still stands: Is there a way to have regular (generic!) routes in namespaces like in rails 2? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
