I just realized it too... so bad for me :)
Ok, I thought there would be another more convenient way but as I can
now see there is not
Regards, thanks everyone
On 22 Mar, 21:21, Stephan Wehner <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Piotr Mąsior wrote:
> > Model is passed by @model variable with nested attributes so it is
> > like:
>
> > @model = model.new
> > @model.build_another
>
> > at form it is looped through like
>
> > - form_for @account, :url => { :action => @given_action , :controller
> > => 'admin'} do |f|
> > - f.fields_for :company do |o|
> > %label{:for => "company|name"}=
> > Company.human_attribute_name(:name)
> > = o.text_field :name, :named => "company|name"
> > - o.fields_for :city do |x|
> > %label{:for => "company|city|name"}=
> > City.human_attribute_name(:name)
> > = x.text_field :name, :named => "company|city|name"
>
> > jquery is responsible for communication and requesting my particular
> > methods so it calls appropriate model basing on something like
> > params[:model], doajaxing method knows how to deal with nested
> > attributes
>
> > so it request from controller some action like
> > doajaxing_for_createmodel and it looks like:
>
> > def doajaxing_for_createmodel
> > doajaxing("account")
> > end
>
> > and doajaxing itself looks like
>
> > def doajaxing(object_name)
> > if request.xhr?
> > sended = params[object_name.to_sym]
> > object_name = object_name.camelize
> > @process = object_name.constantize
> > @process = @process.new(sended)
>
> Because you have "@process.new", the "on_create" validations will be
> triggered.
>
> If you are updating an existing record, use
> @process = @process.find(...model-id...)
> where model-id is usually taken from "params" (params[:id]).
> Then assign the new values to @process.
>
> Then the "on_create" validations will not be triggered.
>
> > @process.valid?
> > ##some other processing
> > if @process.errors[current_given]
> > #process message and field
> > #some @response is given in json
> > render :json => @response
> > end
> > end
>
> > that it work... I wonder if I can use instead of @process.valid?
> > something else
>
> Hope that helps. I think your "doajaxing" method needs to know about the
> two cases, create/update.
>
> Stephan
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
