Frederick Cheung wrote: > On Apr 22, 4:04�pm, Rob Biedenharn <r...@agileconsultingllc.com> > wrote: > >> >> However, it is that same experience that has led me to the conclusion � >> that keeping db/schema.rb in the source repository is wrong. �It is � >> derived data and I would no more put it into the repository than I � >> would have someone put their object files compiled from C or their � >> class files compiled from Java in there. >> > > I think there is a difference between an app like mephisto or similar > where many people are going to be deploying instances all over the > place and a private app for which there is only ever going to be one > deploy.
I disagree. The severity is different, but the issues are the same. > With the latter, the database is the definition of the schema > and you don't care about people deploying the app from scratch because > no one will Two words: staging server. > > Fred Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
