David Zhu wrote: >> This seems like a good use case for has_many :through. > > > It sounds like an excellent case for has_many :through! > > haha i just did it using that method, it works great. thanks guys
You're welcome! > > (Oh, am i posting right?) Yup. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
