On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Conrad Taylor <conra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Sharkie Landshark
> <li...@ruby-forum.com>wrote:
>
>> I have been using link_to_remote forever now. I have also been using
>> jquery through jrails.
>>
>> I am readying my code for Rails 3.0, and am wondering what is the best
>> way to accomplish.
>>
>> For example, I have something like this all over in Rails 2.0
>>
>> <%= link_to_remote "XXX",
>> { :url => "/activities/hide_dock", :update =>
>> "dock-container", :complete => "fixDock()" }, { :class => "activities" }
>> %>
>>
>>
> Sharkie, I would recommend reading the following first before you start
> upgrading from Rails 2.x to Rails 3.x:
>
> http://blog.peepcode.com/tutorials/2010/live-coding-rails-3-upgrade
>
Here's another excellent reference that goes into greater detail of
convert from Rails 2.x to Rails 3.x:
http://www.railsupgradehandbook.com
Good luck,
-Conrad
>
> Next, link_to_remote has been deprecated in Rails 3 and you would
> need to do the following:
>
> <%= link_to "XXX", { :remote => true }, { ... } %>
>
>
>> def hide_dock
>> render :partial => "/layouts/dock"
>> end
>>
>> Now, in Rails 3.0 I am planning this
>>
>> <%= raw link_to "XXX", "/activities/hide_dock",
>> {:remote => true, :class => "activities" }
>> %>
>>
>>
> Next, the above shouldn't use raw because link_to method
> returns an html_safe string in Rails 3.
>
>
>> def hide_dock
>> respond_to do |format|
>> format.html
>> format.js do
>> ????? What do I put here ?????
>>
>
> If you're using RJS, then you'll simple add
> the expression to be executed. For example,
> I tend to be partial to JSON and I would do the
> following:
>
> format.js # render the action.js.rjs by default
>
> or you can redefine it as follows to return json
>
> format.js { render :json => @some_object }
>
>
>> end
>> end
>> end
>>
>>
> It's not clear as to what you're trying to do. The hide_dock is a
> controller
> action so do you want to allow the following:
>
> http://some_domain.com/controller_name/hide_dock
>
>
>> My main question is since I am using jQuery, is there any point in using
>> RJS?
>>
>>
> If you intend on using jQuery, then there's no need to use RJS. Just make
> sure that you get the JS file here:
>
> http://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs
>
>
>> Should I just have
>>
>> render :layout => false
>>
>>
> If you're updating just a part of the page, then you'll need to use the
> above.
>
>
>> and in hide_dock.js.erb just use jQuery code with <%= render :partial
>> =>%> where appropriate.
>>
>
> Lastly, I would recommend getting the PDF for "Agile Web Development with
> Rails 4th Ed" by Sam Ruby, Dave Thomas, et al from pragprog.com for
> additional
> information regarding the questions that you have above.
>
> Good luck,
>
> -Conrad
>
>
>> --
>>
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rubyonrails-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
