Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Fernando Perez <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: >> Good luck, >> >> -Conrad > > Hi Conrad, thanks for the tip. Yeah I'm eagerly waiting for Rails 3 to > get released! > > In the mean time I managed to make Rails 2.3.8 play nicely with Ruby > 1.9.1 and that's very painful to do. I would suggest people to stick to > Ruby 1.8 for some time until everything gets settled. 3rd party gems > also have to be updated to be compatible with the new 1.9 encoding > handling. I have also have been using Rails 2.3.5 and Ruby 1.9.2 for one project for 6+ months. Thus, it has been super simple to get everything working by using RVM. Thus, it will make it super simple to migrate this project to Rails 3. Lastly, if you're using Ruby 1.9.1, then you're definitely using the wrong version Ruby because it does have bugs. Furthermore, Ruby 1.9.2 is the first C Ruby version to pass 100% of the RubySpec. Last but least, Ruby 1.9.2 cleans up the Ruby syntax and provides the much needed speed boost in production. Good luck, -Conrad > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
