Fritz Trapper wrote in post #961110: > OK, so it's no bad idea, to implement page local storage as sketched > above.
I certainly wouldn't commit to saying that. All I'm saying is that it's not a "left-field" idea to have per-window client-side storage. The HTML5 method seems to me to be the right way to manage it. But, unless you're in a unique situation where you can require IE8+ (or any of the many other browsers that support sessionStorage) it's too early it rely on it. There are still too many <=IE7 users out there to even consider this at present. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
